Page 40 - FY 2022-23 Supporting Information

2022-23 PROPOSED BUDGET
PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUNDING POLICY

POLICY
If either the Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System or the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension
System is greater than 100 percent funded, where the total annual required contribution (adopted by their
respective Boards) is less than the amount required to fund the normal cost of retirement and health
benefits for employees, then the City must limit the use of these savings in the budget. Specifically, if the
adopted contribution rate allows the City to contribute an amount less than 90 percent of the normal cost,
this Policy prohibits the City from using these savings to fund the City’s ongoing services and program
costs. Instead, any savings or reduction in funding calculated due to the incremental contribution rate
below the 90 percent threshold will only be budgeted to pay down unfunded pension or healthcare costs
for retirees or, in the event that such costs are fully funded, as an appropriation to the Budget Stabilization
Fund. When the total UAAL is positive, the City will continue to fully fund both the normal cost and UAAL
as required by the City Charter.

Los Angeles Los Angeles City
Fire and Police Employees’
Pensions Retirement
Policy Calculation System System
Normal Cost:
1
Pension/Retirement Benefits 20.27% 7.75%
1
Health Benefits 4.75% 3.62%
Total Normal Cost 25.02% 11.37%

Funding Threshold (Normal Cost times 90%) 22.52% 10.23%
Normal Cost and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability -40.31% -33.31%
1, 2
3
Credit or Cost of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability -17.79% -23.08%

1 These percentages are available in both the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions System (LAFPP) and the Los Angeles
City Employees' Retirement System (LACERS) June 30, 2021 actuarial reports.

2 For 2022-23, the Fire and Police Pensions System’s Normal Cost excludes administrative expenses of 1.36%.
Administrative expenses were previously included in the Normal Cost but they are now broken out separately for LAFPP,
consistent with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB 67) reporting. The LACERS Normal Cost is still
inclusive of administrative expenses, as the LACERS Board of Administration did not adopt a similar change.

3 If the percentage is positive, then the City must set aside an amount (based on the percentage multiplied by salaries)
for one-time expenditures. Since the percentage is negative, however, a credit has not been earned and funding would
not be set aside per this policy.

26